Monday, April 03, 2006

Technology transfer

I always believe that “A little knowledge is dangerous”. Looking at only one side of the deal is not enough, for short term we have got 60 tonnes of Uranium as soon as the deal was signed which we needed badly (If some of you know that India’s two Nuclear Reactors were critically short of Uranium supply). Everybody is selfish so why can’t we, what are our priorities. Being a developing country we need energy: cheap, clean (The volume of U-235 used in the first atomic bombs could be held in your hands. The result was an explosion equivalent to 40,000 conventional bombs.)and continious. One thing I know that conventional sources are not going to help so we have following options 1) Solar energy (costly) 2) Wind energy (Needs space) 3) Nuclear energy.
Now look at developed countries, all of them have nukes but how they are using it. If I am right for Energy, Nuclear ships and Submarines. And I can predict that in near future they will be using them for space ships and transportation. That’s what India needs for the short term. Why to bring US into the picture, more than US we need fuel from Russia and Australia. I think it will be great if we can use US to serve our purpose.

As Vibha says “Plutonium Reactor” better called FBC(Fast Breeder Reactor) I want to point out that it is nothing new, infact India has FBC’s but the thing is we don’t have fuel for them. Till now the deal with US says that NSG will supply fuel for Nuclear plants under International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) safeguards and India will have to use their own Uranium for other Reactors. This is good because India can use that Uranium for FBC’s which inturn can be used to process Plutonium and Thorium. Another promising technological prospect is the development of the reprocessing of used uranium to obtain plutonium, which, when recycled as fuel in nuclear reactors can reduce the need for primary uranium by 30%. It is thought by some people that with the generalization of the breeder-reactor and reprocessing, the developed countries will no longer need to import natural uranium within three or four decades
Even more FBC’s gives fuel, which can be used to build Nuclear Submarines etc.
At liftoff, an orbiter and External Tank carry 835,958 gallons of the principle liquid propellants: hydrogen, oxygen, hydrazine, monomethylhydrazine, and nitrogen tetroxide. The total weight is 1,607,185 pounds. Critical mass for Uranium is roughly 5 kgs and for plutonium is 16 kgs. So if one can use nuclear fuel how light a Space shuttle will be?
One last thing which hardly anybody recognized that India has second largest reserve of Thorium in the World (http://www.world-nuclear.org/info/inf62.htm) and with little help of technology there will be no stopping for India.

5 Comments:

Blogger Vibha said...

my dearest gaurav!
simply love the way you put forth your point..now do you realise why i keep insisting that you should teach?:)
anyway, i still stand by my point of the US coming forth with this deal only to keep its nuclear lobby (private industry which is right now in the dumps) happy.
so solar energy may be expensive, but i doubt the seriousness of those in power to actually explore these options in a more vigorous way before discarding these options.
how safe are we really atlking about gaurav? even today places in idnai where uranium is mined and extracted large masses of the local population are suffering from genetic disorders which may wipe out entire generations of people. is this what we call 'safe'?
perhaps you may scoff at my idealism...
i still stand by my point. i don't subscribe to a wisdom that believes in making its own people live under a constant threat of an impending disaster.

9:44 PM  
Blogger Gaurav said...

Dear Vibha,
Technology has both plus and minuses, what do you think only radioactive substances are harmful.Think of Asbestos and Silicon they are also harmful. But life is as bad as without a discovery of wheel if you drop these substances from life. Imagine a life without electricity, cellphone and computer. I don't know about others but atleast I am dead unless I am engaged in farming to keep myself busy. Here we are so used to these things that if Internet is not working for an hourit seems that we can't breathe.
I appriciate your concern for miners but even coal miners are in danger. If we can use technology better probably we will be able to save such people from direct exposure.

3:12 AM  
Blogger skohari said...

gaurav, simply brilliant!
vibha, "...my idealism" ?

6:08 AM  
Blogger Gaurav said...

Thanks Kohari,
I have learnt many things from you.

11:52 AM  
Blogger Vibha said...

gaurav...
first of all sorry about all the typos..hehe
and i am really sorry if i came thru' as being against technology...i am all for technology..but not without adequate precautions...hence my stand even against Clemenceau..
and i am not really talking about risking miners alone here...
all i am saying is to look at everything critically and question the established wisdom behind so called "truths"

schazeb!
what's the emoticon for "i am sticking my tongue out at you (rudely)!"
:)
hug!

8:55 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home